Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Strother

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Eaton. (Hooker, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The plaintiff in this case was a small boy about six years of age, and brings his suit by his next friend, to recover for injuries received-from an attack upon him by a vicious dog owned by the defendant.

The action is brought under section 2119 of Howell’s Statutes, and which is as follows;

“ If any dog shall have killed or assisted in killing, wounding, or worrying any sheep, lamb, swine, cattle, or other domestic animal, or that shall assault or bite or otherwise •injure any person while traveling the highway, or out of the inclosure of the owner or keeper of such dog, such owner or keeper…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Trager v. ThorMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Fye v. ChapinMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Koetting v. ConroyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Jenkinson v. CogginsMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Slater v. SorgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API