Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank of Texas NA v. James

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 17, 2003No. 01-51298PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:

This banking case presents a preemption question. The Texas Legislature enacted a par value statute, Tex. Bus. & Com.Code § 4.112, (hereinafter “Par Value”) which prohibits banks in Texas, including national banks, from charging a fee for cashing a check that is presented to be drawn against an account that the bank itself holds. Plaintiffs-appellees Wells Fargo Bank of Texas, et al. (the “Banks”) are national banks that do business in Texas. 1 The Banks contend that Par Val ue is preempted by the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 21 et seq., and by 12 C.F.R. §…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Davis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  2. Kronemeyer v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. BoutrisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
  4. Hanjy v. Arvest BankDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2015
  5. Washington v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API