Legal Opinion
United States v. Roger E. Haddad
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 16, 1993No. 92-2041PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EISELE, Senior District Judge.
The defendant, Roger E. Haddad, was charged with knowingly possessing one In-tratec TEC-9, 9 millimeter, semi-automatic pistol, having previously been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year. The gun had been found on March 14, 1991, in the defendant’s apartment during the execution of a search warrant. The defendant entered a not guilty plea to the charge.
Mr. Haddad filed a Motion In Limine to prevent the Government from introducing at trial his April 1, 1992, guilty plea to a state misdemeanor charge of illegal possession…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- United States v. Brad Eugene Branch, Kevin Whitecliff, Jaime Castillo, Renos Lenny Avraam, Paul Fatta and Graeme Leonard CraddockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Johnny Jenkins and Middie Jackson v. Patrick Keating and Michael MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Lopez-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. SalemmeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- United States v. Shanta A. Howell, and George T. Howell, IIICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.