Herbert v. Manson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
The sole issue on this appeal is whether the petitioner has established that his conviction of the crimes of sexual assault in the first degree and kidnapping in the second degree should be overturned because of ineffective assistance of counsel.1 The petitioner, *144Alan W. Herbert, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging incompetence on the part of his retained counsel. The trial court, after an evidentiary hearing, dismissed the petition but granted the petitioner’s request for certification to permit his appeal to this court. We find no error.
The petitioner claims on appeal, as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Levine v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Williams v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Small v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Valeriano v. BronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Aillon v. MeachumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Lebron v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.