Legal Opinion

Herbert v. Manson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 18, 1986No. 12020PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the petitioner has established that his conviction of the crimes of sexual assault in the first degree and kidnapping in the second degree should be overturned because of ineffective assistance of counsel.1 The petitioner, *144Alan W. Herbert, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging incompetence on the part of his retained counsel. The trial court, after an evidentiary hearing, dismissed the petition but granted the petitioner’s request for certification to permit his appeal to this court. We find no error.

The petitioner claims on appeal, as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Levine v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Williams v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Small v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Valeriano v. BronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Aillon v. MeachumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Lebron v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API