Legal Opinion

Austin Powder Co. v. Wallwork

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided February 1, 1990No. EV 89-87-CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION TO CASE

Plaintiff initiated this cause of action by filing a Complaint for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction and Damages on June 6, 1989. On the same day the plaintiff filed a Motion requesting a Temporary Restraining Order. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, diversity of citizenship.

In its Complaint the plaintiff, an Ohio Corporation, claimed that defendants, Todd Wallwork (Wallwork) and James Rutz (Rutz), both residents of Indiana and previous employees of defendant, violated no-compete clauses contained in employment contracts they entered…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Moll v. South Central Solar Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Seach v. Richards, Dieterle & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. LockhartDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API