Diversified Management Services, Inc. v. Slotten
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.
Lary and Dawn Slotten appeal from an order and a judgment confirming an arbitration award. We hold that the Slottens did not present clear and convincing evidence that one of the arbitrators was “evidently partial” within the meaning of sec. 788.10 (1) (b), Stats. Because the arbitrators’ award is incomplete, however, we remand the case to the trial court with directions to remand a portion of the case to the arbitration panel for further proceedings. We modify that part of the judgment awarding prejudgment interest at twelve percent, because that rate is in excess of the legal rate set in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- La Vale Plaza, Inc., a New York Corporation v. R. S. Noonan, Inc., a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Ballantine Books Inc. v. Capital Distributing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Enterprise Wheel and Car Corporation v. United Steelworkers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Borst v. Allstate Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- J.J. Andrews, Inc. v. MidlandCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- DeBaker v. ShahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Sands v. Menard, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- John McAdams v. Marquette UniversityWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.