Legal Opinion

Heady v. Heady

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1989No. 53644PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL R. GAERTNER, Judge.

This case involves the dissolution of a marriage of ten months duration. The trial court denied appellant’s request for $9,600 in lump sum maintenance, found no marital property to be distributed and ordered each party to retain his or her separate property and to pay their respective attorney’s fees. We affirm.

Lissa Heady (appellant) had been employed for five years by Mark Heady (respondent) in his cleaning business. When they decided to marry, an Antenuptial Agreement was prepared by Mark’s attorney. A copy of this agreement was reviewed by Lissa’s personal attorney…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. McQuate v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Roberts v. Estate of RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. S.M.B. ex rel. W.K.B. v. A.T.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Miles v. WerleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Jamison v. JamisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API