In the Interest of S.K.H.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice.
Mr. Robert Holder and Mrs. Phyllis Holder (“the Holders”) appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of Dana Thompson (“Ms. Thompson”) on her Petition for Interference with Possessory Interest in Child, Interference with Child Custody, and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. The Holders challenge the trial court’s judgment on the basis of factual insufficiency. We affirm.
Ms. Thompson is the mother of S.K.H., T.P.T., and N.A.T. The Holders are the grandparents of S.K.H., T.P.T., and N.A.T. Ms. Thompson filed a Petition for Permanent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Britton v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- ERC Midstream LLC and Mark Hutchinson v. American Midstream Partners, LP, American Midstream GP, LLC, High Point Infrastructure Partners, LLC, HPIP Gonzalez Holdings, LLC and Brian BierbachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Queen v. RBG USA Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- In Re Skh, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010
- Jonathan Beryl Harris, the Law Offices of J.B. Harris, PA and J.B. Harris, P.A. v. Phillip T. Howard and Howard & Associates, Attorney at Law, P.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024