Jackson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Presiding Judge.
Bernard Jackson appeals his jury convictions for armed robbery and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
The appellate court reviews the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, giving deference to the jury’s determination on the proper weight and credibility to be given the evidence. It is for the jury to determine the credibility of the witnesses and to resolve any conflicts or inconsistencies in the evidence. .
(Citations and punctuation omitted.)…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fults v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Dawson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Harper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Charles Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.