State v. Walker
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Boggs, Judge.
The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting James D. Walker a new trial on the basis of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Under the applicable standard of review, the trial court did not clearly err in concluding that counsel’s failure to investigate, interview, and present two exculpatory witnesses constituted ineffective assistance. We therefore affirm.1
To succeed on his claim of ineffective assistance, [Walker] must satisfy both prongs of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668 (104 SC 2052, 80 LE2d 674) (1984); that is, he must prove that his attorney’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Tenorio v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- State v. CrappCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Ransom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Joseph Lee Tumlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
- Melvin Andrew Sutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020