Legal Opinion

Eubank v. Bostick

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 15, 1917No. 677PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvauthaul, J.

In January, 1915, appellant and appellee contracted with Jernigan & AVatts for 1,000 head of steer yearlings and 100 head of heifers in New Mexico, to be thereafter delivered in New Mexico about the 1st of June of that year. It was originally agreed between appellant and appellee that of said cattle Eubank should have and handle 300 head of the steers, and that Bos-tick should have the remainder of the steers and the heifers of the purchase, each putting up forfeit money in proportion to their respective interests. Subsequently appellant and appellee entered into the following agreement in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Self v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Forshey v. G. H. & H. RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Payne v. MetzTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Shawnee Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Thomas v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Masterson v. Amarillo Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Oscar Callaway v. C.M. AlbinTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Temple v. Riverland Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Barnes v. Early-Foster Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Wheeler v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API