Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kondash

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 2002PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STEVENS, J.:

¶ 1 The Commonwealth appeals from the order entered on May 17, 2001, in the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County, which suppressed heroin, intravenous needles, and a stationhouse confession obtained from Appellee after an arrest. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

¶2 On the morning of December 18, 2000, Detective William Muse of the State College Police Department and Centre County Drug Task Force established surveillance of Appellee’s residence after at least five known heroin users named Ap-pellee as a heroin trafficker. N.T.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClintonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. MacKSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. PreacherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API