Legal Opinion

Dynair Electronics, Inc. v. Video Cable, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1976No. Civ. 14230PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN (Gerald), P. J.

Dynair Electronics, Inc. and Dyna-Cable, Inc. appeal a two-count judgment—each count involving different legal issues and different parties—following a trial by the court.

I

In April 1971, Frank Castro, Bob Richardson, Donn Maurer and Michael Grupp formed a general partnership, Video Cable Service (VCSG), pursuant to an oral agreement. VCSG engaged in the business of contracting for the construction, installation, and financing of Master Antenna Television systems (MATV). Once VCSG obtained a contract, it would hire Castro (dba Video Cable) to actually install the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ellsworth v. EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Sousa v. First California Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Rossi v. ZappaterraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Fredendall v. ShraderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. San Diego Fruit & Produce Co. v. ElsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Holt v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Fuller v. Stonewall Cas. Co. of W. Va.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Bird v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. In Re Alcom America Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
  5. In re Lipitor Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API