Legal Opinion
In Re Morahan
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided July 3, 1972No. Misc. 54-57PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BREWSTER, Chief Judge.
General Summary
Pascal Morahan, Daniel Crawford, Mathias Reilly and Thomas Laffey were each held in civil contempt of this Court for failure to obey its order, entered after a grant of immunity under Title 18, United States Code, Sections 6001, 6002 and 6003, directing him to testify before a grand jury of this Court then in regular session. Each one of them was committed to the custody of the United States Marshal of this District until he purged himself by giving his testimony, or until the grand jury was finally discharged, whichever happened first.
Though the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pacific Coast European Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Phoenix Assurance Co. of Canada v. RunckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Maiuri v. TagessianMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993
- PHOENIX ASSUR. CO. OF CANADA v. RunckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982