In the Interest of K. S.

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

The mother of four-year-old twins K. S. and K. S. appeals from the juvenile court’s termination of her parental rights.1 She contends the judgment is against the weight of the evidence. We affirm.

In considering the mother’s appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the juvenile court’s disposition and determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the mother’s right to custody should have been terminated.2 We neither weigh the evidence nor determine the credibility of the witnesses, but instead…