Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Belmont Land Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

■ FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County. Andrew Allison, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

This is an ejectment suit, brought by A. E. Garrett and J. A. Hayes, Jr., to recover lots Nos. 23 and 41 in what is styled the O. B. Hayes plan, a suburb of Nashville.

The Belmont Land Company claims, and is in possession of,- lot No. 41, and defendant, Valentino, claims, and is in possession of, No. 23. Upon the hearing, the Chancellor gave judgment for the complainants for the lots, and defendants have appealed and assigned errors.

Both parties trace their titles to a common source, Joel A. Hayes, Sr., who was the father of complainant, J. A. Hayes, Jr., the father-in-law of 'complainant,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fowler v. ShearerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  2. Koehler v. Black River Falls Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
  3. Miners' Ditch Co. v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Elwell v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  5. Isham v. Bennington Iron Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1847

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. GodfreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Brier Hill Collieries v. GerntTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Bensdorff v. UihleinTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API