Carrisales v. Department of Corrections
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
The California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) 1 declares certain kinds of discrimination and harassment in the workplace to be “unlawful employment practice^].” (§ 12940.) We must decide whether an employee may be personally liable to a coworker for sexual harassment under the FEHA. We conclude that the FEHA does not apply to actions between coworkers not involving a supervisorial relationship.
I. Procedural History
Plaintiff Maryann Carrisales, an employee of the Department of Corrections (Department) sued the Department, two of her…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don SchupakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Farmers Insurance Group v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Patricia A. Brooks v. City of San Mateo, a Municipal Order and Corporation San Mateo Police Department John Stangl, Chief of Police Steven SelvaggioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines PartnershipCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Leslie Kohler,plaintiff-Appellant v. Inter-Tel Technologies,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Plute v. Roadway Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2001
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.