Legal Opinion

Fraternal Order of Transit Police ex rel. Lamb v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Judge.

Fraternal Order of Transit Police (FOTP), by and through its Trustee Ad Litem, David J. Lamb, petitions for review of a decision of the Chief of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) Police that declined to adopt FOTP’s position that SEPTA Transit Police officers are “other law-enforcement officers” within the meaning of Section 6106(b)(1) of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6106(b)(1). SEPTA filed a motion to quash FOTP’s appeal. For the reasons that follow, we transfer FOTP’s appeal to the appropriate court of common pleas.

FOTP is a labor organization…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Marshall v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Union Switch & Signal, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Quinn v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Safety, Agriculture, Villages & Environment (S.A.V.E.), Inc. v. Delaware Valley Regional Planning CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Blount v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Blount v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Cooper v. SEPTACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API