Legal Opinion
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Union Switch & Signal, Inc.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 14, 1994No. 907 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.
The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) appeals from an order of the Board of Claims denying its motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because the Board of Claims determined that it had exclusive jurisdiction to hear a contract claim filed against SEPTA by Union Switch & Signal, Inc. (Union Switch).
On January 23,1989, Union Switch and SEPTA entered into a contract by which Union Switch agreed to supply and install electrical equipment and material for power and signal systems as part of the construction of the Broad Street Subway Express Tract.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Marshall v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Lighton v. Abington TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Simon AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Lesser v. Warren BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. SchweikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- East Stroudsburg University Foundation v. Office of Open RecordsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Cooper v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Ross Development Co. v. Advanced Building Development, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- James J. Gory Mechanical Contracting, Inc. v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.