Legal Opinion

Di Giuseppe v. Hrivnak

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1948No. Appeal, 21PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The plaintiff, a father, suing on his own behalf and on behalf of his minor son, appeals from the refusal of the court to take off a compulsory nonsuit in his action against the defendants, John Hrivnak and Joseph Vaulko.

Between nine and ten o’clock on the evening of August 14,1945, people in the Borough of Phoenixville, by driving cars and trucks about the streets, were noisily celebrating the surrender of Japan. The minor, aged ten years and ten months, was standing on the running board of Hrivnak’s motor truck and was injured when the truck and Vaulko’s sedan…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Filer v. FilerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Ferrell v. SolskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Simpson v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Salvitti v. ThroppeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Srednick v. SylakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MOUNT v. BulifantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Marinelli v. Montour RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Hill v. CrawfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API