Legal Opinion

Pitts v. Camp

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided August 17, 1971No. Civ. A. 69-979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

In August 1967, plaintiffs applied to the Comptroller of the Currency pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 21 et seq. to organize a new bank in Hartsville, South Carolina. Plaintiffs, the organizers of the proposed new bank, filed information with the Comptroller and a field investigation was conducted by a national bank examiner. Based upon the file thus obtained, the Comptroller denied plaintiffs’ application on April 15, 1968. Subsequent to the initial denial, plaintiffs submitted additional data and requested reconsideration by the Comptroller. The request for reconsideration…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. CampCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  3. Sterling National Bank of Davie v. William B. Camp, Comptroller of the Currency, (2cases)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. First National Bank v. SaxonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
  5. Bank of Haw River v. SaxonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Balaji Doraiswamy v. Secretary of Labor. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. v. The Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. Pitts v. CampCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API