Legal Opinion

Crew v. Flanagan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 30, 1954No. 36,181PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Plaintiffs bring this action for an accounting of royalties which they claim are due and owing from defendants, as licensees under a patent license agreement, over a period extending from April 1, 1949, to the time of trial. Defendants counterclaim for all royalties paid by them to the plaintiffs, as licensors, over a period extending from July 1, 1947, to March 31, 1949, in the sum of $5,370.17.

The matter was tried without a jury, and findings were entered denying relief to plaintiffs and granting relief to defendants on their counterclaim in the amount of $5,370.17.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Pope Manufacturing Co. v. GormullySupreme Court of the United States · 1892

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bowers Manufacturing Co., Inc., a Corporation v. All-Steel Equipment, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. Viki Hosiery Corp. v. MarguliesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API