Legal Opinion

Bowers Manufacturing Co., Inc., a Corporation v. All-Steel Equipment, Inc., a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 29, 1960No. 16527PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge. .. This is an action for specific enforcement of a patent license agreement. Summary judgment was . granted to plaintiff All-Steel, and from this judgment Bowers presses this appeal. The district court had jurisdiction, of this action. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. ' This'Court has jurisdiction on appeal.' 28 U.S.C. § ...

„ , As of January 1,1955, appellee entered into a nonexclusive license agreement with appellant, under which appellant was licensed to make use and sell certain devices under the Keierleber Patent; was required to render certain financial statements; and pay…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Edward Katzinger Co. v. Chicago Metallic Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. Harvey Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. MacGregor v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Co. v. John J. Reynolds, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lear Siegler, Inc., a Corporation v. John S. AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Crown Machine & Tool Co. v. D & S Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API