Legal Opinion
Whittlesey v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 13, 1992No. 78 September Term, 1991Published
1Opinion of the Court
326 Md. 502 (1992)
606 A.2d 225
MICHAEL WHITTLESEY
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND.
No. 78 September Term, 1991.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
May 13, 1992.
Thelma J. Thompson, Acting Deputy Dist. Public Defender, Towson and George E. Burns, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, argued and on brief (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, Baltimore, on brief), for appellant; and Michael Whittlesey, pro se.
Gary E. Bair, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued and on brief (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., on brief), Baltimore, for appellee.
Argued before ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, ROBERT M. BELL, JJ., and CHARLES E.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.
2Cases cited103 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.