Swenson v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS MOOT
MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
Currently before the Court are Plaintiff Susan Swenson’s motion for summary judgment and Defendant T-Mobile’s motion to dismiss, stay, or transfer the proceedings. The dispute arises out of non-compete provisions included in several documents signed by Swenson in connection with her previous employment with T-Mobile. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss and DENIES Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as moot.
I. Background
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pelleport Investors, Inc. v. Budco Quality Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- R.A. Argueta, Husband Mary Argueta, Wife Grupo Sal Corporation v. Banco Mexicano, S.A. Francisco Suarez Davila Alonso Cuevas Del VillarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Smith, Valentino & Smith, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cagle v. Mathers Family TrustSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- AYCO COMPANY, LP v. FrischDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
- Dexcom, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Edwards Vacuum LLC v. Hoffman Instrumentation Supply, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2021