Legal Opinion
Martel v. Rovira
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 8, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOTION TO DISMISS.
MOUTON, J.
Under the ruling of the Supreme Court in this case we think plaintiff has a right of appeal, and the motion to dismiss is therefore denied.
MERITS.
In execution of a judgment obtained by Rovira against Martel, the Sheriff seized the undivided interest of the latter in a tract of land in the Parish of St. Mary. Martel applied for an injunction to arrest the sale under the seizure. The Court ordered defendant, seizing creditor, to show cause why a preliminary writ of injunction should not be granted, and at the same time issued a restraining order compelling the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Legget v. PotterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1854
- Vance v. NoelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Connell v. David Bernhardt Paint Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Martel v. Jennings-Heywood Oil SyndicateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- Billeaudeaux v. ManuelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Noel v. Jumonville Pipe and MacHinery CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Vicksburg v. DrexlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Eden v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Noel v. Jumonville Pipe and MacHinery CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963