United States v. Monaghan
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
SCHILLER, District Judge.
Defendant Donald Monaghan is charged with honest services mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1346. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s motion in limine to exclude the testimony of expert witness John J. Contino. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant was a twenty-five year employee of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) whose duties included the purchase of chemicals and other products. According to the indictment, over a five-year period,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Carmelita Elcock v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. LeoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- VITAMIN ENERGY, LLC v. EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023