Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Cashion

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER Cueiam.

The issue which the court submitted to itself and answered, considered in the light of the pleadings, is of very doubtful meaning at best. Its ambiguity is such that the answer thereto will permit, in one view of the matter, the construction that the verdict is favorable to defendants and is contrary to the judgment entered. Furthermore, the issue, in any view of the matter, does not dispose of all material controversies arising on the pleadings, and therefore it will not support a final judgment. Rubber Co. v. Distributors, 253 N.C. 459, 117 S.E. 2d 479. The questions in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. General Tire and Rubber Co. v. Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Wynne v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrelson Ex Rel. Randolph v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. HPS, INC. v. All Wood Turning Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Gibson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API