Legal Opinion

Lazar v. Hertz Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1999No. Nos. A080439, A080767PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, J.

Adam Lazar filed a class action complaint for damages and injunctive relief against four rental car companies alleging that they refused to rent automobiles to persons under age 25 or unreasonably restricted such rentals. After all of the alleged causes of action were adjudicated against Lazar, the trial court entered judgment in favor of defendants. In these consolidated appeals, Lazar argues, inter alia, that the trial court erred (1) in finding that a refusal to rent to drivers under age 25 is permitted by section 1936 of the Civil Code1 and (2) by finding the imposition…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API