United States v. Davis
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
BERRIGAN, District Judge.
The defendant, Len Davis (“Davis”), is representing himself pro se, with standby counsel to assist, in the penalty phase of this remanded capital case. He has consistently stated his intention to present no evidence in mitigation of the death penalty and invites the death penalty to be imposed. This Court previously revoked Davis’ self-representation and ordered his standby counsel to assume full representation and to prepare a full penalty phase defense. That decision was reversed by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which concluded that Davis had…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Dylann RoofCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- In Re Xpedior Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- In the Matter of Crosby Dredging, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026