Legal Opinion

United States v. Davis

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided August 30, 2001No. CRIM.A. 94-381PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

BERRIGAN, District Judge.

The defendant, Len Davis (“Davis”), is representing himself pro se, with standby counsel to assist, in the penalty phase of this remanded capital case. He has consistently stated his intention to present no evidence in mitigation of the death penalty and invites the death penalty to be imposed. This Court previously revoked Davis’ self-representation and ordered his standby counsel to assume full representation and to prepare a full penalty phase defense. That decision was reversed by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which concluded that Davis had…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Dylann RoofCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  2. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. In Re Xpedior Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  4. In the Matter of Crosby Dredging, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API