Ramsey v. . Ramsey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRAKXini.r., J.
The uncontroverted evidence locates the boundary line from the beech to a point on the ridge as contended by plaintiff and as shown on the court map. This places the triangular tract on which the spring is located within the bounds of the deeds relied on by plaintiff. Plaintiff’s line, as thus located, is the eastern line of the tract claimed by defendant under the express call in his deed. Thus defendant’s claim to this small tract must rest on proof of adverse possession for 20 years.
Whether defendant has offered any evidence of open, notorious, exclusive, and continuous adverse possession…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wallace v. BellamySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Wallace v. . BellamySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Vanderbilt v. . ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Barrett v. . BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Johnston v. CaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Newkirk v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Simmons v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Freeman v. PreddySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Lancaster v. Maple Street Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Brite v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.