Legal Opinion

Folgar v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant Taylor Rental failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by showing that it was not negligent in renting an allegedly defective stump grinder to the plaintiffs employer (see Martin v Hacker, 83 NY2d 1, 9 n 1 [1993]; Haight v Banner Metals, 300 AD2d 356 [2002]; Johnson v Johnson Chem. Co., 183 AD2d 64, 69 [1992]). Furthermore, Taylor Rental failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law based on a lack of proximate cause, since it did not prove that the plaintiff did not use the allegedly defective stump grinder on the date…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. HackerNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Johnson v. Johnson Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Gilbert v. Kingsbrook Jewish CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Haight v. Banner Metals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Restrepo v. Rockland Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API