Legal Opinion

Lucas v. Rea

California Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from Superior Court, Mendocino County; J. Q. "White, Judge. Action by R. R. Lucas against S. L. Rea and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The judgment in favor of plaintiff established and decreed the foreclosure of a lien for materials used in the construction of a residence belonging to defendant Rea, and which ,was mortgaged to the said Bank of Ukiah.

1. The complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The eases cited to the contrary by appellants are not in point. For instance, in Nason v. John, 1 Cal. App. 540, 82 Pac. 566, it is stated: “The action is by a materialman against the owner (appellant) for the value of material furnished the contractor for the painting of the *365house of appellant. There is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. McClain v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Malone v. Big Flat Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Ward v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Yancy v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harbridge v. Six Points Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API