Legal Opinion
State v. Davis
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 26, 2014No. 13CA3589 13CA3593PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as State v. Davis,
2014-Ohio-5371.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Case Nos. 13CA3589 13CA3593 Plaintiff-Appellee, : v. : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY JOSEPH B. DAVIS, : Defendant-Appellant. : RELEASED: 11/26/2014 APPEARANCES: Joseph Davis, London, Ohio, pro se appellant. Mark E. Kuhn, Scioto County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jay Willis, Scioto County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Portsmouth, Ohio, for appellee. Harsha, J. {¶1} Joseph Davis entered into an agreement in which he pleaded guilty to illegal manufacture of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SillmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State v. PanezichOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. RueOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. McIntoshOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. ChildersOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.