Legal Opinion
United States v. William P. Clark
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 28, 2015No. 14-1251PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
William Patrick Clark’s trucking business was hired to perform hauling services on a state-and federally funded highway project in Missouri. Because federal funds were in play, Clark’s contract with the project’s general contractor required that he pay his truck drivers the federal prevailing wage pursuant to the Davis-Bacon Act (which, at the time, was $35.45/ hour). Clark chose not to do so, however, individually contracting with his drivers for roughly $15/hour instead. Throughout the project, as required by his contract, Clark submitted weekly payroll certifications…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. William H. RandleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. LuptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Zhang Bin v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. John T. Burns, IIICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Michael ChaparroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Deronarte NorwoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Idaho Building & Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. Inland Pacific Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.