Commonwealth ex rel. Bittner v. Price
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts:
I do not agree that an appeal from the denial of a habeas corpus petition is interlocutory and therefore must be quashed. The result of such a doctrine would be to render unappealable all challenges to the legality of pretrial detention. However, I do believe that Bittner’s present incarceration is lawful and thus would affirm the denial of the writ on this basis, rather than quash this appeal.
The function of a writ of habeas corpus is to test the legality of the prisoner’s detention. See Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 399-420, 83 S. Ct. 822, 827-38…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Levine v. FairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- MacKowain v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Young v. Bradford County Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Quinn v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907