Legal Opinion

Underwood Livestock, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 7, 2009No. 05-0162LPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND ENTERING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT

WILLIAMS, Judge.

In this Fifth Amendment takings case, Plaintiff Underwood Livestock, Inc. (“Underwood”) alleges that the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) obstructed Underwood’s use of its water rights by removing a water diversion structure in a creek flowing within Underwood Canyon in Nevada, and by fencing and barricading the surrounding area. The Interior Board of Land Appeals (“IBLA”) concluded that there was no right-of-way authorizing the construction or maintenance of the diversion…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Columbus Regional Hospital v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
  3. Taylor Energy Company LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  4. Taylor Energy Company, L.L.C. v. InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
  5. Nstar Electric Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API