Legal Opinion
United States v. Quicken Loans Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 18, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-0613PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
Reggie B. Walton, United States District Judge
The government initiated this action against Quicken Loans Inc. (“Quicken”) pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733 (2012), Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶ 1, alleging that, between September 1, 2007, and December 31, 2011, Quicken “knowingly approved loans that violated FHA [Fair Housing Act] rules while falsely certifying compliance with those rules,” id., which permitted Quicken “to profit from these loans, even if borrowers defaulted on their mortgages, while placing all of the risk” on the federal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Research Automation, Inc. v. Schrader-Bridgeport International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of Pennsylvania. Appeal of the Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, Inc. Appeal of S. Mort ZimmermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Thayer/Patricof Education Funding, L.L.C. v. Pryor Resources, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram, P.C. v. HazardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. YeagerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States v. Quicken Loans Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Flanagan v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021