Geel v. Goulden
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from St. Clair; Tappan, J. Bill by Amanda J. Geel and others against Theophilus A. Goulden, the Factory Land Company, Limited, and Charles Wellman, trustee, to foreclose a land contract. The Factory Land Company, Limited, by cross-bill, prayed for affirmative relief. From a decree for complainants against defendant the Factory Land Company, and for the other defendants dismissing the complainants’ bill, defendant the Factory Land Company appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
The bill of complaint was filed in this suit by complainants for the purpose of foreclosing a certain land contract, dated October 22, 1902, for the sale of a tract of land, described by metes and bounds, located in the southern portion of the city of Port Huron, St. Clair county, Mich.
The contract purports to sell the land to T. A. Goulden, and is signed by the vendors only, who are the complainants herein. The consideration stated is $5,000, to be paid as follows:
“$1,000 down on the signing of this contract, and the balance on or before five years, with the privilege of paying $1,000 or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mull v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Citizens' Savings Bank v. VaughanMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Hoyt v. Paw Paw Grape Juice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Armstrong v. StearnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Rhoades v. Malta Vita Pure Food Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carland v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Lukens Iron & Steel Co. v. Hartmann-Greiling Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Prater v. Game Time, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984