Legal Opinion
Smith v. Middletown Township of Pennsylvania
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 25, 2025No. 2:23-cv-02412Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CURTIS SMITH : : Plaintiff : v. : CIVIL ACTION : : MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP OF : NO. 23-2412 PENNSYLVANIA, et al. : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM Perez, J. February 25, 2025 Pro se Plaintiff Curtis Smith alleges Middletown Township of Pennsylvania (the “Township”) lacks authority to regulate the use of his private property, and its attempts to do so violated his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Presently before the Court is the Township, Jim Ennis, and Stephanie Teoli Kuhls’ (collectively, “Defendants”) motion for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.