Legal Opinion
Humbach v. Goldstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 16, 1998PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, (1) the defendants D & D Elevator, Inc., and Robert Schaeffer d/b/a D & D Elevator Maintenance & Repair appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered February 19, 1998, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and (2) the defendants Arlene Joyce Goldstein, 40 Barker Avenue Co., and Samson Management Co. separately appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same order as denied their…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kush v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Antonik v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Jackson v. . GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Lopez v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Bowen v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by11 opinions
- Egan v. A.J. Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Niewojt v. Nikko Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Gurmendi v. Perry Street Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Soomaroo v. Mainco Elevator & Electrical Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Devoy v. 1110/1130 Stadium Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.