Trump v. Baltzell
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Cross-Appeals from the’ Court of Chancery.- The bill in. this case was filed by Thomas and Philip Baltzell, on the 24th of June 1841, against William B. Trump, to recover the sum of $2100, under the facts alleged in the bill, which, together with the terms of the articles of copartnership between the parties, are sufficiently stated in, the opinion of this court.
Read the full summary
Cross-Appeals from the’ Court of Chancery.- The bill in. this case was filed by Thomas and Philip Baltzell, on the 24th of June 1841, against William B. Trump, to recover the sum of $2100, under the facts alleged in the bill, which, together with the terms of the articles of copartnership between the parties, are sufficiently stated in, the opinion of this court. The partnership commenced on the 7th of February 1835, and was dissolved by articles of dissolution, dated the 9th of February 1838. By the first of these articles, the Baltzells bound themselves to pay all claims against the firm up…
1Opinion of the CourtLe Grand, C. J.
These are cross-appeals from a decree of the chancellor, passed in a cause in which the facts, as alleged in the bill, are substantially as follows: Thomas and Philip Baltzell entered into a copartnership with William B. Trump, and the terms under which it was to exist and be conducted were specified in writing. These were, so far as the questions in this case are involved, that the Baltzells and Trump were to contribute to the capital an equal amount, constituting in the whole the sum of fourteen thousand dollars. The partnership was to last for three years. It was stipulated by the third…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jones v. BeltCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1844
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gibbs v. GaleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
- Ehrmann v. StitzelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Badder v. SaleebySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924