Strong ex rel. Reed v. Darling
Ohio Supreme Court
Covenant. From Lorain. The suit is brought upon a sealed land contract between the parties, dated March 22,1836, by which the defendants “bind themselves, their heirs and administrators, to pay or cause to be paid to the plaintiff, his heirs, etc., the sum of $350, in manner following — that is to say, fiity dollars on July 1, 1836; $100 on April 1, 1837; and $100 annually thereafter until ■the whole sum be paid, with interest to be paid annually, etc.; and in consideration…
Read the full summary
Covenant. From Lorain. The suit is brought upon a sealed land contract between the parties, dated March 22,1836, by which the defendants “bind themselves, their heirs and administrators, to pay or cause to be paid to the plaintiff, his heirs, etc., the sum of $350, in manner following — that is to say, fiity dollars on July 1, 1836; $100 on April 1, 1837; and $100 annually thereafter until ■the whole sum be paid, with interest to be paid annually, etc.; and in consideration of the above payments being punctually made at ■the time and in the manner specified,” the plaintiff agreed and bound…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Wood, J.
Do tbo facts set forth in the notice annexed to the defendants’ plea bar the plaintiff’s action? Section •6 of the act referred to in the notice, 29 Ohio L. 350, provides that all proprietors of lots or grounds in any city or town corporate in this state, who have subdivided or laid out, or who shall subdivide and lay out the same in lots for sale, shall cause accurate and true ■maps or plats thereof to be made and recorded in the 'office of the recorder, in the county in which such town or city may be situated, etc.; and section 7 enacts, that if such proprietor shall…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- McCullough Transfer Co. v. Virginia Surety Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954