Minton v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The central question presented for our consideration is whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, former Section 1381 et seq., Title 15, U.S.Code (“Safety Act” or “Act”),3 precluded appellant from presenting evidence at trial that the 1990 Accord was defective for failure by Honda to install a driver’s-side air bag in the vehicle.4 For the reasons that follow, we find that appellant should have been allowed to present evidence to the jury that the 1990 Accord did not have an air bag and that Honda did install air bags in its 1992…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hyundai Motor Co. v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Cooper v. General Motors Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Bailey v. Manor Care of Mayfield Hts.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Fisher v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.