Legal Opinion

Young v. Berryhill

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 27, 2019No. 4:18-cv-01721Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARY ANN YOUNG, 7 Case No. 18-cv-01721-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 9 SUMMARY JUDGMENT NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 19 Defendant. 11 12 Plaintiff Mary Ann Young moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of 13 the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which 14 found Young not disabled and therefore denied her application for benefits under Title II of the 15 Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. § 401

et seq. [Docket Nos. 18 (“Pltf. Mot.”),…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API