Legal Opinion

Kercheval v. Ross

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided February 24, 1934No. 10633PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARIS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring in equity a class suit for themselves and all others who are similarly interested and situated, to enjoin defendants, including defendant Ross, who is collector of the revenue of Pemiscot county, Mo., from accepting in payment of drainage taxes, past-due bonds and coupons of defendant drainage district No. 8, in Pemiscot county.

The defendant drainage district was organized, about 1912, under the provisions of article 4 of chapter 41 (section 5578 et seq.), Revised Statutes of Missouri of 1909, now article 2 of chapter 64 (§ 10809 et seq.), Revised…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  4. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Golden v. SchaulSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  2. In Re Missouri Pac. R. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1934
  3. Seeley v. Kansas CityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API