Legal Opinion

Continental Corp. v. First National Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 23, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

The second two actions are at law; they are in tort, in the nature of deceit. The plaintiffs seek to recover from the defendant damages alleged to have been suffered by them by reason of false representations alleged to have been made by the defendant, as trustee, by its certificate on certain bonds of The Martin Trailer Co. The first suit is in equity, and is brought against the defendant, as trustee under an indenture, to secure these bonds, for an accounting and for damages for breach of its fiduciary duties. The bonds involved are the same as those which were before this court in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Chatham & Phenix National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Benton v. Safe Deposit BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Continental Corp. v. GowdyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Ainsa v. Mercantile Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  5. First National Fire Insurance v. SalisburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Feldmeier v. Mortgage Securities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Betts v. Massachusetts Cities Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API