Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Grand Trunk Ry.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided October 1, 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

At Law. Action by Edward W. Wiley against the Grand Trunk Railway of Canada. Plaintiff was awarded a verdict of $3,500, and defendant moves to set the verdict aside and grant a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

The plaintiff sued to recover damages for personal.injuries. The jury awarded him $3,500. This is a motion to sfet that verdict aside and grant a new trial.

The facts involve.the liability of an interstate railway carrier under the anti-pass provisions of the Hepburn Act for personal injuries sustained, through the carrier’s negligence, by a plaintiff who was injured while traveling on a drover’s pass in the care of live stock. The jurisdiction of this court is founded on diversity of citizenship; the plaintiff being a resident and citizen of the state of New York, and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Gleeson v. Virginia Midland RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. The MajesticSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Northern Pacific R. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Bradford Elec. Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Nevill v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Lindsey v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Tripp v. Michigan Cent. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API