Legal Opinion
Nevill v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided November 15, 1922No. 354-3096PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGallagher, J.
Gid D. Nevill, plaintiff in error, was plaintiff, and the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Company, defendant in error, was defendant', in the trial court, and they will be so designated in this court.
Plaintiff instituted this suit to recover damages for personal injuries which he alleged he sustained while a passenger on one of defendant’s trains. He alleged that the injuries suffered by him were the direct and proximate result of. negligence on the part of the defendant, its agents and employees in charge of said train in failing to protect him from an assault by one Mullins, a passenger…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Santa Fe, Prescott & Phœnix Railway Co. v. Grant Bros. Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. SolanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Harmar Bottling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. ThomassonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. QuernerTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- International-Great Northern R. v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.