Legal Opinion

Urban v. Doolan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1937No. Docket No. 70, Calendar No. 39,694PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.

On April 2, 1936, plaintiffs entered into a contract to purchase of defendants a certain farm of 80 acres situated in St. Joseph county, Michigan, for the agreed price of $3,500, $1,000 of which Ivas paid at the time of the execution of .the contract. None of the defendants lived on the farm nor had any of them occupied it for many years with the exception of the defendant Ellen A. Doolan, who lived in Kalamazoo, and who occasionally stayed there over week-ends. The house on the premises was built very shortly .after the year 1863 by the father of the defendants.

Before the purchase of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Konstantine v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Ogden v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Pluchak v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Backus v. KirschMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fegeas v. SherrillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Sullivan v. UlrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API